Why Robot is not a Substitute for Human Tester

by Nataliia Vasylyna | April 6, 2016 7:06 am

It’s been years and years of discussions about replacing all manual testing processes with automated ones. This goes along with the general debates of whether or not robots will be able to take our jobs away.

In software testing, there are particular tasks that should better be automated. Among them are data gathering, analysis, statistics. Test automation is intended to simplify and accelerate functional testing[1], mobile testing, integration testing[2] and other types of testing. However, it cannot cover all of the processes.

What Are the Advantages of Human Approach over Machine Approach?

Combination of human efforts and automation is a perfect blend, and it’s not going to change for a long time.

Learn more from QATestLab

Related Posts:

  1. functional testing: https://qatestlab.com/services/We-Are-Professionals-in/functional-testing/
  2. integration testing: https://qatestlab.com/services/Step-by-Step/Integration-Testing/
  3. Security testing: https://qatestlab.com/services/Is-Your-Software-Secure/security-testing/
  4. Can AI bots replace the testers team or no?: https://blog.qatestlab.com/2019/04/11/ai-in-qa/
  5. Key Steps in Automated Testing: https://blog.qatestlab.com/2011/03/03/key-steps-in-automated-testing/
  6. Manual Testing vs. Automated Testing: A Decision Point: https://blog.qatestlab.com/2011/03/01/manual-testing-vs-automated-testing-a-decision-point/

Source URL: https://blog.qatestlab.com/2016/04/06/robots-human-testers/