Exploratory Testing – Advantages and Disadvantages

Exploratory Testing – Advantages and Disadvantages
February 23 17:58 2011 Print This Article

Note: this article was updated in August 2019.

Is everything in software testing depends on strict planning? Not always. Speaking about exploratory testing in Agile or any other project methodology, the basic factor to rely on is the qualification of testers. QATestLab is glad to share the tips on what must be considered while executing this testing.

What is Exploratory Testing

The basic aim of this testing is to find out the actual work of a product and its behavior under various conditions. Exploratory testing directly depends on the skill set of a tester. If testers pose a wide knowledge of the software, testing techniques, and are experienced in the composition of test cases, testing will likely be successful.

process of exploratory testing

Such testing is effective to apply in case of incomplete requirements or to verify that previously performed tests detected important defects. Exploratory testing is also a suitable method if there are strict timeframes at a project.

Pluses and Minuses of Exploratory Tests

Like any other testing type, exploratory tests have definite conditions under which they perform best as well as benefits and possible pitfalls. Let’s have a look at them.

Advantages:

  • possible to apply if there are no requirement documents;
  • involve the investigation to detect additional bugs;
  • much preparation is not necessary;
  • accelerate bug detection;
  • previous results can be used for future testing;
  • overcome test automation by effectiveness;
  • reexamine all testing types.

Disadvantages:

  • it is difficult to reproduce the failure;
  • hard to decide whether the tools are needed;
  • difficult to determine the most suitable test case;
  • reporting is difficult without planned scripts;
  • limited by testers’ skills set;
  • difficult to document each procedure;
  • it is not easy to say which tests were already performed.

Difference Between Exploratory and Automated Testing

The factors of a difference between these two types can be considered as pluses and minuses at the same time, but the majority of elements proves the simple flow of test performance during exploratory testing. Let’s define them.

exploratory vs  automated testing

How to Perform Exploratory Testing

Exploratory test management strategy should be based on 5 main stages:

  1. Develop a bug classification.
  2. Classify the bugs in the previous projects by types.
  3. Analyze the reasons for glitches.
  4. Define the risks and suggest ideas for testing.
  5. Create a testing charter.

Test Charter must include:

  • what must be tested;
  • how the testing must be performed;
  • what must be considered.

Results Review:

  1. Defects assessment.
  2. Learning based on the performed testing activities and their results.
  3. Analysis of areas covered.

Debriefing:

  • compilation of output data;
  • results and charter comparison;
  • checking of need for extra testing.

The process of exploratory testing must meet certain requirements which state that the goal and tasks of testing are clearly defined as the specifications do not play the first part here. However, it is reasonable to note what must be tested, for what reason and visualize the quality assessment of the application under testing.

Summary on Exploratory Testing

Exploratory testing does not have strictly defined strategies, but this testing still remains powerful. It allows testers to work with real-time test cases. The freedom of exploratory testing allows applying the method independently from the development model of a project because it requires a minimum of documents and formalities. Such an advantage proves this testing to be a good helping tool to detect critical bugs concentrating on the project’s quality without thinking much about precise documenting.

Related Posts:

About Article Author

view more articles
Nataliia Vasylyna
Nataliia Vasylyna

View More Articles
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Exploratory Testing – Advantages and Disadvantages | Ukrainian Software Testers - QATestLab -- Topsy.com()

  • http://acorunason.eu/graffblog/ Floretta

    Large fan on this site, lots of your articles have truly helped me out. Looking forward to up-dates!

  • http://www.riseteck.com Roger Richardson

    The real problem is that managlement does not have a firm grasp on what the output of exploratory testing will do. The comforting numbers that come out of scripted testing give them a effort measurement. Most test cases find a single issue. Once fixed running it again just increases the numbers but not the knowledge of reliability.
    Exploratory testing is the left to the unmeasurable art of the tester. The numbers from exploratory testing shows more problems found per hour than scripted testing.
    Scripted testing establishes a baseline to test from. It also teaches the tester how the app works quickly.Then exploratory testing takes over going into the undefined, gray areas of the app.

  • Ammad_Aslam

    Referring to your comment “And replace the tactical plan with setting a goal”. I think in exploratory testing we don’t have any particular goal then to testing but in Ad hoc based we do have a goal or aim to perform.